Author summary
61% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,025 analyzed words
BS Summary: These J.R. Dunn results contain 44 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,857 hits . Analysis detected 15,117 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,058 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 73% (1,826 of 6,628 authors). This J.R. Dunn is worse (more manipulative) than 72.50% of the peer group. J.R. Dunn
Author details
Total words: 9,058
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
73% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 72.5% percentile 3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles9.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 20.5% 20.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 15.7% 15.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 8.6% 8.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 12.5% 12.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.7% 2.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.5% 2.5% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.6% 5.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 20.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Author 12.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.6%, sitewide 15.9% Unattributed Quote: Author 15.7%, sitewide 1.1% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 10.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 6.5%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 6.2%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.2%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.6%, sitewide 1.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 5.5%, sitewide 3.1% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 3.8%, sitewide 0.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.4%, sitewide 0.8% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst