Maine offers its best 93%

By J.R. Dunn61%

7/18/2026, 4:00:00 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anecdotal, and Unattributed Quote, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.4% saturation with 156 hits. Analysis detected 1,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 329 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 87.3% and a BS Rank of 93% (1,666 of 21,203 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 92.10% of the article peer group.

Many were surprised to see a transgender from central Maine taking part in the state's Democrat senatorial candidate debate this week. 
That's an area of the world generally given over to farmers, loggers, and hunters. 
The trannie in question was Ashley Webb, and he's from Farmington, which goes a long way toward answering that question. 
Ashley Webb appears to be a gentle, confused soul afflicted with serious emotional fragility (he started crying right in the middle of his presentation ), something of a reversed gender version of Ellen Page, as opposed to the commonplace type fueled by uncontrolled rage, like this guy . 
Farmington is located in south central Maine about two hours north of Portland. 
It's the seat of Franklin County, and one of the biggest towns in a rural area. 
It's also, largely due to its University of Maine campus, one of the LGBT hotspots of New England. 
I lived in Farmington for a short period years ago. 
Walking down Main, on which the campus fronts, I was puzzled by the number of heavyweight young women - two hundred pounds and up, many with shaved heads and wearing overalls and the like. 
At first, I figured that was just the Maine rural look. 
I was at last set straight (so to speak) by a member of a local religious sect (who look Mennonite but aren't), who explained that the Farmington campus was the major gay focus of the entire state. 
That lends to Farmington a patina of sophistication unique for a town with one major intersection. 
It's also quite a switch from its previous claim to fame as the home of Chester Greenwood , the inventor of earmuffs. 
The interesting thing is that Ashley Webb wasn't even the weirdest candidate who appeared at the debate. 
That would be current Secretary of State Shenna Bellows, who comes across as an android whose programming has been compromised. 
Susan Collins is looking better all the time. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 9.4%J.R. Dunn: 8.3%American Thinker: 10.4%Confirmation Bias9.4%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 1.1%American Thinker: 0.7%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%J.R. Dunn: 2.7%American Thinker: 3.7%Availability Heuristic11.2%This article: 19.1%J.R. Dunn: 3.8%American Thinker: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic19.1%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 2.0%American Thinker: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 3.4%American Thinker: 2.7%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.9%J.R. Dunn: 1.7%American Thinker: 7.2%Framing Effect4.9%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.7%J.R. Dunn: 0.8%American Thinker: 0.6%Status Quo Bias6.7%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 2.4%J.R. Dunn: 0.6%American Thinker: 1.6%Optimism Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 3.2%American Thinker: 2.6%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 42.6%J.R. Dunn: 12.5%American Thinker: 13.0%Negativity Bias42.6%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 1.1%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 14.6%J.R. Dunn: 3.9%American Thinker: 2.9%Fundamental Attribution Error14.6%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 21.0%J.R. Dunn: 3.0%American Thinker: 3.9%In-Group Bias21.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 5.5%American Thinker: 5.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 19.5%J.R. Dunn: 2.5%American Thinker: 2.7%Halo Effect19.5%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 2.9%American Thinker: 0.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.1%American Thinker: 0.1%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.2%J.R. Dunn: 0.7%American Thinker: 1.3%Recency Bias5.2%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.7%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 6.1%J.R. Dunn: 6.2%American Thinker: 5.7%Ad Hominem6.1%This article: 14.6%J.R. Dunn: 3.2%American Thinker: 4.1%Straw Man14.6%This article: 11.2%J.R. Dunn: 3.0%American Thinker: 4.7%Appeal to Authority11.2%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 3.8%American Thinker: 4.7%False Dilemma0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 2.9%American Thinker: 3.3%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.3%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 12.5%J.R. Dunn: 10.1%American Thinker: 16.9%Hasty Generalization12.5%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.5%American Thinker: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 1.5%American Thinker: 0.5%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.7%J.R. Dunn: 8.6%American Thinker: 8.5%Appeal to Emotion20.7%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 1.6%American Thinker: 2.7%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 11.6%J.R. Dunn: 6.2%American Thinker: 3.8%Post Hoc (False Cause)11.6%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 1.3%American Thinker: 1.7%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.2%American Thinker: 0.6%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.8%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 42.6%J.R. Dunn: 6.5%American Thinker: 3.6%Anecdotal42.6%This article: 11.2%J.R. Dunn: 0.4%American Thinker: 0.4%No True Scotsman11.2%This article: 24.0%J.R. Dunn: 3.4%American Thinker: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)24.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.3%American Thinker: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.6%American Thinker: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 31.9%J.R. Dunn: 15.7%American Thinker: 3.1%Unattributed Quote31.9%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.9%American Thinker: 1.9%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 47.4%J.R. Dunn: 20.5%American Thinker: 23.0%Biased Writer Voice47.4%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 3.8%American Thinker: 5.8%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.7%American Thinker: 0.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 8.5%J.R. Dunn: 5.6%American Thinker: 14.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias8.5%This article: 0.0%J.R. Dunn: 0.0%American Thinker: 0.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

329 words analyzed.

Speakers

1speaker6.1%attributed speech309writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 48 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageShenna Bellows • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Shenna Bellows

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words100% of attributed speech86% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Unattributed Quote+72.5 ptsWriter: 27.5%Shenna Bellows: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice+56.0 ptsWriter: 44.0%Shenna Bellows: 100.0%100.0%Politically Right Leaning -9.1 ptsWriter: 9.1%Shenna Bellows: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.