Author summary
56% 1 analyzed article/video 960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicole LaFond results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Politically Left Leaning Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 543 hits . Analysis detected 2,720 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 61% (2,506 of 6,357 authors). This Nicole LaFond is worse (more manipulative) than 60.60% of the peer group. Nicole LaFond
Author details
Total words: 2,880
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.6% percentile 3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.0% 5.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.1% 1.1% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 12.7% 12.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 2.8% 2.8% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 6.0% 6.0% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 5.2% 5.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.7%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 2.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 5.1%, sitewide 7.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 6.0%, sitewide 2.0% Anecdotal: Author 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Author 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Recency Bias: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.4% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst