Publication summary
89% 9 analyzed articles/videos 8,181 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Talking Points Memo results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.6% saturation with 4,018 hits . Analysis detected 31,570 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,453 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (168 of 379 publications). This Talking Points Memo is worse (more manipulative) than 55.80% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 29,453
Article count: 9
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
56% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 55.8% percentile 2.1% BS Score9 analyzed articles29.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 6.2% 6.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Publication 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.7% 2.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 5.1% 5.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 13.6% 13.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 12.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 13.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 12.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Publication 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 5.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Anchoring Bias: Publication 1.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Publication 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Bandwagon: Publication 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst