Author summary
⁠86%1 analyzed article/video664 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Layla A. Jones results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Politically Left Leaning Bias, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 31.8% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 3,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,992 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (561 of 6,628 authors). This Layla A. Jones is worse (more manipulative) than 91.50% of the peer group.
Layla A. Jones
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Sneha Dey1%
⁠0%Ideastream Public Media1%
⁠0%Jacob Owens1%
⁠1%Megan Fan Munce1%
⁠92%Layla A. Jones (selected)8%
⁠100%Greg Rosenstein38%
⁠100%Siham Shamalakh43%
⁠100%Greg Miller54%
⁠100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
⁠100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 1,992
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

92% percentile
025507510091.5% percentile
7.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 31.8%31.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 22.9%22.9%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Author 17.9%17.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 12.3%12.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Author 9.6%9.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 8.1%8.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 1.7%1.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.8%4.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 4.8%4.8%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Author 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 31.8%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Author 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 22.9%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Author 20.2%, sitewide 19.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 17.9%, sitewide 2.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 9.6%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 8.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 7.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Author 5.1%, sitewide 5.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.8%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Author 4.2%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.4%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.9%Bandwagon: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Composition/Division: Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Author 1.2%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos