Author summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 2,473 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Sharon Lerner results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 16.6% saturation with 2,461 hits . Analysis detected 17,140 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,781 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 43% (3,627 of 6,348 authors). This Sharon Lerner is better (less manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group. Sharon Lerner
Author details
Total words: 14,781
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
43% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 42.9% percentile 2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles14.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 16.6% 16.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.5% 11.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.9% 1.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.7% 2.7% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 12.2% 12.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 4.7% 4.7% Horn Effect Sitewide 1.0% Author 3.8% 3.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 16.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 9.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 4.7%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 4.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 4.0% Genetic Fallacy: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 3.8%, sitewide 1.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Author 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst