Author summary
71% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Maria Barry-Jester results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Appeal to Authority , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 5,143 hits . Analysis detected 27,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,587 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,562 of 6,204 authors). This Anna Maria Barry-Jester is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group. Anna Maria Barry-Jester
Author details
Total words: 28,587
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
27% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 26.5% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Author SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 18.0% 18.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 1.0% 1.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.8% 1.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.8% 13.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 18.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst