Author summary
71%4 analyzed articles/videos3,979 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Anna Maria Barry-Jester results contain 51 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 18% saturation with 5,143 hits. Analysis detected 27,663 faulty-reasoning hits from 28,587 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 27% (4,562 of 6,204 authors). This Anna Maria Barry-Jester is better (less manipulative) than 73.50% of the peer group.
Anna Maria Barry-Jester
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
27%Anna Maria Barry-Jester (selected)2%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 28,587
Article count: 4
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

27% percentile
025507510026.5% percentile
1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles28.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 18.0%18.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Author 1.0%1.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 13.8%13.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Author 3.0%3.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 1.1%1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 6.5%6.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Author 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 11.8%11.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 18.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 13.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Author 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Author 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Author 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Author 3.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2%Genetic Fallacy: Author 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate