Author summary
ā 79% 1 analyzed article/video 955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Madiba K. Dennie results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Negativity Bias , with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 380 hits . Analysis detected 2,878 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,865 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of ā 76% (1,635 of 6,628 authors). This Madiba K. Dennie is worse (more manipulative) than 75.30% of the peer group. Madiba K. Dennie
Author details
Total words: 2,865
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
75% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 75.3% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 11.1% 11.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.3% 5.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 9.0% 9.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.5% 3.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 13.3% 13.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.1% 10.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.8% 4.8% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.6% 2.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 9.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 13.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.1%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 5.4%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.9%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Author 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Recency Bias: Author 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 2.9%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 1.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst