Speaker summary
⁠64%1 analyzed article/video45 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Roberts results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal and Negativity Bias, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 60 hits. Analysis detected 120 faulty-reasoning hits from 45 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 66.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (6,110 of 28,364 speakers). This Amanda Roberts is worse (more manipulative) than 78.50% of the peer group.
Amanda Roberts
Speaker details
Total words: 45
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

79% percentile
025507510078.5% percentile
66.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos45 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 100.0%100.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 50.0%50.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 50.0%, sitewide 19.2%Fundamental Attribution ErrorSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos