Author summary
89% 1 analyzed article/video 2,260 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Niko Vorobyov results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Post Hoc (False Cause) , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23.2% saturation with 1,571 hits . Analysis detected 6,185 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,780 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 36% (3,954 of 6,171 authors). This Niko Vorobyov is better (less manipulative) than 64.10% of the peer group. Niko Vorobyov
Author details
Total words: 6,780
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
36% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 35.9% percentile 2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.1% 8.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.7% 1.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 23.2% 23.2% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Author 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 2.2% 2.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 23.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.6%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 6.0%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Slippery Slope: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst