Author summary
33% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,763 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Peter Rosenberger results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.8% saturation with 766 hits . Analysis detected 5,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,676 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of 15% (5,336 of 6,228 authors). This Peter Rosenberger is better (less manipulative) than 85.70% of the peer group. Peter Rosenberger
Author details
Total words: 8,676
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
14% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.3% percentile 1.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles8.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 1.7% 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 0.9% 0.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 3.9% 3.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.3% 1.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 2.3% 2.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 1.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 3.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 6.7% In-Group Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 3.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Indoctrination: Author 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.8%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst