Fox News98%

BREAKING: New video shows Iranian missile attack on US base in Jordan 84%

7/20/2026, 12:00:20 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Framing Effect, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 32.8% saturation with 192 hits. Analysis detected 1,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 585 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.8% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,424 of 20,883 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 83.60% of the video peer group.

So, the Department of War just confirmed the identity of two active duty soldiers who were killed in Operation Inherent 
Resolve. 
>> It's 25-year-old First Lieutenant Tyler James Feehan and 19-year-old Private Isabella Gonzalez. 
Meanwhile, the United States retaliating with a nice straight night of strikes on Iranian military sites. 
>> Alexandria Hoff is at the White House with the latest for us. Alex? 
>> Good morning to you. 19 and 25 years old, that is a hard pill to swallow this morning, but the current air campaign against Iran right now, this is really punishments for these specific IRGC factions that have targeted US airbases including that base in Jordan that proved to be so deadly. 
Now, circulating video of what is believed to be those strikes was released by the Associated Press. 
The Pentagon confirming this weekend that the two US service members were killed leaving a third missing, though unidentified remains have been found. 
That person is still unidentified at this time. 
The president though is expressing profound grief with this. 
>> Well, we feel very badly, but you know, those great people, those great patriots were out there fighting that Iran should not have a nuclear weapon. 
But we hit them very hard again tonight. 
And we did that in honor of the probably three. 
It's probably three as opposed to two great patriots. 
>> The continuation of US strikes focus on IRGC weapons hubs and command centers. 
The Secretary Rubio speaks to the losses as well. 
>> And it's heartbreaking and our hearts go out to these families. 
These are heroes that pay the ultimate price. 
We also lost a service member in Iraq unrelated to combat. 
They were They were decommissioning ammunition and an accident happened in that process and they were harmed. 
>> That separate death took place in northern Iraq and occurred according to the Pentagon during controlled detonation of an Iranian drone. 
Now, President Trump is also looking to add more squeeze to Iran financially as well. 
Pressing Republicans to add Iran to a pending Senate bill aimed at Russia. 
The president writing on Truth Social, "Republicans should add Iran to the Russia sanctions bill. 
That's what Lindsey" he's referring referring to Lindsey Graham there wanted to do and it was going to happen. Important. 
Now right now they are hoping to bring up the Russian sanctions bill before August recess, so we'll see if there is any movement on that, guys. 
So back to you. 
>> All right, thanks so much. So you include Iran, anyone dealing with Iran will get massive sanctions. 
That's a double hit on China. 
So if the president does do that, does that jeopardize his uh President Xi's trip here in September where I the Secretary of State's going over there now to kind of set the groundwork for that. 
So we'll see. 
In other words, if China continues to deal with Russia, we sanction China. India continues to deal with Russia, sanction sanction India. And anyone who deals with Iran, that's a double sanction on 
>> This is going to become complicated 
as we know the Indian Prime Minister has a great relationship with the president. 
So this is definitely going to This is where the rubber's going to meet the road. 
Meanwhile, 
>> Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 1. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.0%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias6.0%This article: 3.1%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias3.1%This article: 22.6%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic22.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias4.6%This article: 13.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias13.0%This article: 24.6%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect24.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias5.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 13.7%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias13.7%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.6%This article: 20.0%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias20.0%This article: 1.4%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias1.4%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error4.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias4.6%This article: 5.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect5.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias4.6%This article: 8.0%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 30.9%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority30.9%This article: 8.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma8.7%This article: 4.6%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope4.6%This article: 3.4%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning3.4%This article: 14.7%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization14.7%This article: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring1.9%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 32.8%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion32.8%This article: 13.7%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question13.7%This article: 6.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)6.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof0.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 6.5%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal6.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 7.2%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)7.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote2.6%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 4.1%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…4.1%

585 words analyzed.

Speakers

7speakers25%attributed speech438writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageDepartment of War • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageAlexandria Hoff • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePentagon • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coveragepresident • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageSecretary Rubio • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coveragePentagon • 22 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Trump • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coveragePresident Trump • 15 words • 100.0% coverageLindsey Graham • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 33 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Lindsey Graham

100%flagged-word coverage
20 attributed words14% of attributed speech98% writer coverage
0%5.0%10.0%Attempt to Sell a Product -5.5 ptsWriter: 5.5%Lindsey Graham: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.