Keyword summary
95% 2,077 analyzed articles/videos 572,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Youtube results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.1% saturation with 550,948 hits . Analysis detected 6,110,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,877,315 analyzed words across 2,069 videos, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of 70% (10,581 of 34,207 keywords). This Youtube is worse (more manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group. Youtube
Keyword details
Total words: 2,877,315
Video count: 2069
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
69% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 69.1% percentile 3.9% BS Score2,069 analyzed articles2.9M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 19.1% 19.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 11.8% 11.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 12.6% 12.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 18.9% 18.9% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Keyword 4.3% 4.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 19.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 18.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.6%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.1%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 3.7% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 4.0% Recency Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 7/23/2026, 4:00:06 AM
NTD 100% 7/23/2026, 3:15:17 AM