Publication summary
100% 246 analyzed articles/videos 60,653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NTD results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.6% saturation with 66,604 hits . Analysis detected 724,862 faulty-reasoning hits from 294,459 analyzed words across 245 videos, generating a BS Score of 4.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (33 of 371 publications). This NTD is worse (more manipulative) than 91.40% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 294,459
Video count: 245
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
91% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.4% percentile 4.6% BS Score245 analyzed articles294.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Publication 16.8% 16.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 15.3% 15.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Publication 21.6% 21.6% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 22.6% 22.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Publication 8.8% 8.8% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Publication 5.8% 5.8% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Publication 4.3% 4.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Publication 5.3% 5.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Publication 9.7% 9.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Publication 4.5% 4.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 22.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 21.6%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 16.9%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Publication 16.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 15.3%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Publication 14.2%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 12.1%, sitewide 9.1% Optimism Bias: Publication 9.7%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 8.8%, sitewide 4.6% In-Group Bias: Publication 8.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 6.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Publication 6.3%, sitewide 5.2% Begging the Question: Publication 5.8%, sitewide 1.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% False Dilemma: Publication 5.3%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Publication 4.5%, sitewide 0.8% Burden of Proof: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 0.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Publication 4.0%, sitewide 1.4% Recency Bias: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Slippery Slope: Publication 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 7/22/2026, 4:30:38 AM
NTD 100% 7/21/2026, 10:00:00 PM
NTD 100% 7/21/2026, 9:30:21 PM
NTD 100% 7/21/2026, 9:00:36 PM
NTD 100% 7/20/2026, 3:00:26 PM
NTD 100% 7/20/2026, 3:00:01 PM
NTD 100% 7/20/2026, 2:00:16 PM
NTD 100% 7/20/2026, 1:13:39 PM
NTD 100% 7/20/2026, 12:54:17 AM
NTD 100% 7/18/2026, 7:00:29 PM