NTD⁠100%

RFK: Our Job is not Stop the Bad Guys, (But) to Stop the Fraud Before it Happens! ⁠100%

7/21/2026, 9:00:36 PM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Confirmation Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 101 hits. Analysis detected 808 faulty-reasoning hits from 101 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠100% (182 of 20,921 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.10% of the video peer group.

Every dollar that the federal government allows to be lost to fraud, waste, and abuse is a dollar stolen from American patients and from the American taxpayer. 
And that's money that should be going to legitimate health care. 
President Trump directed us to end this corruption after President Biden and my predecessor, Xavier Becerra, allowed it to flourish. 
Our job is not just to catch the bad guys. 
Our job is to stop the fraud before it happens. 
Today, I have two major announcements. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 74.3%NTD: 15.5%Confirmation Bias74.3%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.9%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 12.1%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.4%Representativeness Heuristic0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.8%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 26.7%NTD: 9.1%Overconfidence Bias26.7%This article: 94.1%NTD: 22.7%Framing Effect94.1%This article: 54.5%NTD: 1.8%Loss Aversion54.5%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.0%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 9.9%NTD: 9.8%Optimism Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 43.6%NTD: 16.9%Negativity Bias43.6%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.6%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 19.8%NTD: 3.2%Fundamental Attribution Error19.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 73.3%NTD: 8.1%In-Group Bias73.3%This article: 9.9%NTD: 4.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias9.9%This article: 0.0%NTD: 6.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 5.9%NTD: 2.3%Primacy Effect5.9%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 19.8%NTD: 1.6%Ad Hominem19.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.2%Straw Man0.0%This article: 19.8%NTD: 14.1%Appeal to Authority19.8%This article: 16.8%NTD: 5.4%False Dilemma16.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.2%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 26.7%NTD: 17.1%Hasty Generalization26.7%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 64.4%NTD: 21.9%Appeal to Emotion64.4%This article: 20.8%NTD: 6.0%Begging the Question20.8%This article: 19.8%NTD: 5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)19.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.4%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.7%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 1.4%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 6.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 9.9%NTD: 4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)9.9%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.1%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 100.0%NTD: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice100.0%This article: 26.7%NTD: 2.2%Indoctrination26.7%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 63.4%NTD: 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias63.4%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

101 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.