Topic summary
96% 2,057 analyzed articles/videos 557,638 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Video results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 547,530 hits . Analysis detected 6,042,835 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,790,549 analyzed words across 2,049 videos, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 67% (5,150 of 15,235 topics). This Video is worse (more manipulative) than 66.20% of the peer group. Video
Topic details
Total words: 2,790,549
Video count: 2049
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
66% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 66.2% percentile 4.0% BS Score2,049 analyzed articles2.8M analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 19.6% 19.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.3% 13.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 19.3% 19.3% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Topic 3.5% 3.5% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 4.4% 4.4% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 7.3% 7.3% Begging the Question Sitewide 1.7% Topic 3.6% 3.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 19.6%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 19.3%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.3%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 11.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 5.3% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.8% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.7% Recency Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 2.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.7% Burden of Proof: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.4% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
NTD 100% 7/23/2026, 4:00:06 AM
NTD 100% 7/23/2026, 3:15:17 AM