NTD100%

Communism is The Single Greatest Threat to America! 100%

7/23/2026, 3:15:17 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Pessimism Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 65.1% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 1,374 faulty-reasoning hits from 218 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 100% (172 of 20,451 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 99.20% of the video peer group.

Communism is, in my opinion, communism 
is the single greatest threat to our country in its history including even World War II, and World War II, Pearl Harbor, 9/11. 
I think it's the greatest threat that I've ever seen to our country. 
These people are stone-cold crazy. 
And it is the enemy of the free people everywhere and everywhere in the world. 
You see it happening and every time it starts to happen 
the areas where it's at, whether it's blue states, you see the blue states are all going bad. 
They're all going bad cuz communism is a loser. 
The concept, the policy, it's a loser and it always has been and it always will be. 
And you know, they want to give everyone everything away. 
You want free rent, you want free house, you want to What they don't say is in a year from now there'll be absolute squalor, turmoil, and death. 
And that's the way it's happened all the way. 
It's It goes back thousands of years by different names, but that's the way it happens all the time. 
It's squalor. 
It's poverty. 
It's death. It's destruction. 
And that's why we declare again today that the United States of America will never be a communist country. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 34.4%NTD: 15.5%Confirmation Bias34.4%This article: 19.3%NTD: 3.9%Anchoring Bias19.3%This article: 43.1%NTD: 12.1%Availability Heuristic43.1%This article: 8.3%NTD: 2.4%Representativeness Heuristic8.3%This article: 4.1%NTD: 1.7%Hindsight Bias4.1%This article: 25.2%NTD: 9.0%Overconfidence Bias25.2%This article: 10.6%NTD: 22.7%Framing Effect10.6%This article: 12.8%NTD: 1.8%Loss Aversion12.8%This article: 8.7%NTD: 2.0%Status Quo Bias8.7%This article: 7.8%NTD: 0.4%Sunk Cost Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 9.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 49.5%NTD: 2.7%Pessimism Bias49.5%This article: 33.0%NTD: 16.9%Negativity Bias33.0%This article: 8.7%NTD: 4.5%Self-Serving Bias8.7%This article: 4.6%NTD: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error4.6%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.6%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 11.5%NTD: 8.1%In-Group Bias11.5%This article: 10.6%NTD: 4.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias10.6%This article: 0.0%NTD: 6.7%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.3%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 3.9%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 22.9%NTD: 2.3%Primacy Effect22.9%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 2.3%NTD: 1.6%Ad Hominem2.3%This article: 17.4%NTD: 1.1%Straw Man17.4%This article: 0.0%NTD: 14.1%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 18.8%NTD: 5.4%False Dilemma18.8%This article: 31.2%NTD: 3.2%Slippery Slope31.2%This article: 2.8%NTD: 0.5%Circular Reasoning2.8%This article: 65.1%NTD: 17.1%Hasty Generalization65.1%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.5%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.7%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 50.5%NTD: 21.8%Appeal to Emotion50.5%This article: 25.2%NTD: 5.9%Begging the Question25.2%This article: 14.7%NTD: 5.0%Post Hoc (False Cause)14.7%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 27.5%NTD: 4.4%Burden of Proof27.5%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.7%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 15.1%NTD: 1.4%Composition/Division15.1%This article: 19.7%NTD: 6.3%Anecdotal19.7%This article: 8.7%NTD: 0.5%No True Scotsman8.7%This article: 2.8%NTD: 4.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)2.8%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 8.7%NTD: 0.7%Genetic Fallacy8.7%This article: 4.6%NTD: 2.1%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.8%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 2.2%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 4.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%NTD: 0.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

218 words analyzed.

Speakers

No attributed speakers were identified in this analysis.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.