Keyword summary
0% 11 analyzed articles/videos 6,150 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Senate Elections results contain 52 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22.9% saturation with 6,708 hits . Analysis detected 42,214 faulty-reasoning hits from 29,248 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 48% (17,999 of 34,040 keywords). This Senate Elections is better (less manipulative) than 52.90% of the peer group. Senate Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 29,248
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 47.1% percentile 2.8% BS Score11 analyzed articles29.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 13.9% 13.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 22.9% 22.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 15.3% 15.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 22.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 13.9%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 1.4% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.4% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst