Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 776 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Tyler Olson results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Unattributed Quote , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 22% saturation with 684 hits . Analysis detected 3,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,104 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 63% (2,340 of 6,244 authors). This Tyler Olson is worse (more manipulative) than 62.50% of the peer group. Tyler Olson
Author details
Total words: 3,104
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 62.5% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.1% 16.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 0.6% 0.6% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Author 7.9% 7.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.3% 2.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.2% 0.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.9% 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 22.0% 22.0% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 22.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 17.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 0.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Unattributed Quote: Author 7.9%, sitewide 1.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.0%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Burden of Proof: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.4% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.4%, sitewide 0.0% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Author 2.3%, sitewide 0.5% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst