Author summary
0% 16 analyzed articles/videos 9,144 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Amanda Macias results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Politically Right Leaning Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 7,678 hits . Analysis detected 52,810 faulty-reasoning hits from 53,364 analyzed words across 16 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 26% (4,590 of 6,135 authors). This Amanda Macias is better (less manipulative) than 74.80% of the peer group. Amanda Macias
Author details
Total words: 53,364
Article count: 16
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
25% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 25.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score16 analyzed articles53.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.4% 14.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.1% 7.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.5% 4.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.3% 3.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.8% 1.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.1% 2.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 5.7% 5.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 5.7%, sitewide 1.4% Biased Writer Voice: Author 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.0%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Author 2.8%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst