Author summary
0% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,812 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Asra Q. Nomani results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Biased Writer Voice , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 28.1% saturation with 9,467 hits . Analysis detected 47,883 faulty-reasoning hits from 33,642 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 59% (2,536 of 6,140 authors). This Asra Q. Nomani is worse (more manipulative) than 58.70% of the peer group. Asra Q. Nomani
Author details
Total words: 33,642
Article count: 6
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 58.7% percentile 3.0% BS Score6 analyzed articles33.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 15.4% 15.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 13.0% 13.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 3.0% 3.0% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.3% 0.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 1.3% 1.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 28.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 4.5%, sitewide 15.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 15.4%, sitewide 1.4% Appeal to Authority: Author 5.5%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.8%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Author 10.2%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 3.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 9.0%, sitewide 8.1% In-Group Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 4.0%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Author 4.0%, sitewide 2.2% Self-Serving Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 3.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.1%, sitewide 0.8% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Unattributed Quote: Author 2.7%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst