Author summary
0% 14 analyzed articles/videos 20,545 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Charles Creitz results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 11,104 hits . Analysis detected 75,750 faulty-reasoning hits from 79,015 analyzed words across 14 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (4,710 of 6,135 authors). This Charles Creitz is better (less manipulative) than 76.80% of the peer group. Charles Creitz
Author details
Total words: 79,015
Article count: 14
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
23% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 23.2% percentile 1.8% BS Score14 analyzed articles79K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.4% 7.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 4.1% 4.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 2.9% 2.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 2.5% 2.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 2.6% 2.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 14.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 5.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 4.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 2.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 2.7%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Author 2.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.8%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.2%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Loss Aversion: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Author 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst