Fox News87%

WATCH: Hearing turmoil as Jasmine Crockett unloads on MLK's niece in wild racially-charged rant 74%

By Charles Creitz0%

6/10/2026, 9:02:38 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 30.3% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 1,460 faulty-reasoning hits from 692 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 66.1% and a BS Rank of 74% (5,459 of 20,370 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 73.20% of the article peer group.

Rep. 
Jasmine Crockett erupted at Republicans, calling them a "majority… White" party and accusing them of using a member of Martin Luther King Jr.’s family as a prop to shield themselves from allegations of racism while interrogating the Southern Poverty Law Center's funding of hate groups. 
Crockett, who is leaving office next year after a failed Senate bid, lambasted Republicans for expressing outrage at the SPLC while not addressing the "literal elephant in the room"  a reference to Martin Luther King Jr.’s more conservative niece, Alveda King. 
Crockett disparaged civil rights activist Alveda King as a right-wing prop while accusing Republicans of trying to trick the public into thinking a "Doctor King" was criticizing the SPLC’s work. 
King later questioned whether Crockett was calling her a "bastard" of the King name. 
"The vast majority on that side of the aisle… are White men. 
White men are lecturing people of color because the vast majority, actually any semblance of diversity comes from this [Democratic] side of the aisle," Crockett said. 
FIRST ON FOX: SPLC'S TAX-EXEMPT STATUS UNDER THREAT AFTER FIERY CAPITOL HILL HEARING 
She said people of color don’t feel welcome in the GOP and "that’s why you have to parade someone who has the name ‘Doctor King’ attached to them so people can be confused." 
Notably, GOP Rep. 
Wesley Hunt, a fellow Black Texan, was on the committee’s dais and pointedly questioned SPLC leader Bryan Fair earlier in the day. 
Hunt often rebukes talk of race-based partisanship by quipping that he has been "Black my entire life." 
Crockett said Republicans were hypocritical in accusing the SPLC of funding hate groups, citing a debunked assertion about President Donald Trump’s comments following the 2017 White supremacist rally in Charlottesville. 
She noted Trump had said there were "fine people on both sides," but omitted that he later clarified he was referring to a community group opposing the removal of Gen. 
Robert E. 
Lee’s statue, a gathering that occurred before the neo-Nazi violence erupted later that day. 
Crockett then claimed people on social media were wondering who the "Doctor King" was who was speaking out against the SPLC as the hearing progressed, and that Republicans were trying to make the public think the historic Dr. 
Martin Luther King Jr. would be on their side. 
NEARLY ALL SUSPECTS ARRESTED IN ST. 
PAUL CHURCH STORMING AS MLK’S NIECE SAYS TACTICS ‘NOT THE WAY’ 
Crockett said Republicans would be better served calling the Obama-supporting Martin Luther King III or his sister Bernice King to the hearing  suggesting they understand the civil rights icon’s teachings and positions better than Alveda. 
Before her time expired, she accused King and Republicans of "caping" for murdered activist Charlie Kirk  quoting a controversial statement by the Turning Point USA founder about the Civil Rights Act. 
She also claimed Republicans hauled Fair and King before the committee because they wanted to distract from their failure to hold a hearing examining associates of deceased financier and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. 
When House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, gaveled-out Crockett’s time and passed the floor to Rep. 
Russell Fry, R-S.C., the Republican gave King a chance to respond. 
"I am a bit emotional," King said of what Crockett had claimed. 
"I’m going to watch what I say." 
Crockett did not appear to look back at Alveda King and was briefly seen closing her notebook as she prepared to stand up. 
JASMINE CROCKETT'S HISTORY OF PLAYING THE RACE CARD GOING AFTER CONSERVATIVE AND LIBERAL CRITICS 
"It seems as though you (Crockett) have suggested that I am bastard to the King family legacy. 
I am legitimately the daughter of Reverend Alfred Daniel Williams King and Dr. 
Naomi Ruth Barber King," Alveda King said. 
Rev. 
A.D. 
King was Martin Luther King Jr.’s brother. 
CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP 
"We are a family who loves God. 
And I love you, God bless you," King said before yielding back to Fry. 
Fry then announced that, off-camera, Crockett had quickly left the room before King could substantively respond to her remarks. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 14.7%Charles Creitz: 2.5%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias14.7%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.3%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 7.4%Charles Creitz: 2.9%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic7.4%This article: 6.8%Charles Creitz: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic6.8%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.8%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 18.4%Charles Creitz: 14.1%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect18.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.8%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.6%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 30.3%Charles Creitz: 11.0%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias30.3%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.9%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.2%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.0%Charles Creitz: 4.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias9.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 3.5%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 3.2%Charles Creitz: 2.6%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect3.2%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 2.7%Charles Creitz: 0.7%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias2.7%This article: 8.1%Charles Creitz: 0.5%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect8.1%This article: 5.5%Charles Creitz: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias5.5%This article: 11.4%Charles Creitz: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem11.4%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.6%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%Charles Creitz: 4.1%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 9.0%Charles Creitz: 1.5%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma9.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 1.7%Charles Creitz: 5.2%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization1.7%This article: 9.2%Charles Creitz: 1.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring9.2%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.7%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 12.0%Charles Creitz: 7.4%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion12.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.2%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 3.8%Charles Creitz: 3.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)3.8%This article: 4.3%Charles Creitz: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque4.3%This article: 9.2%Charles Creitz: 0.4%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof9.2%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 2.0%Fox Nation: 2.3%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.3%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.3%Charles Creitz: 0.4%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.3%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 1.9%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 8.2%Charles Creitz: 0.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote8.2%This article: 2.5%Charles Creitz: 0.6%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection2.5%This article: 21.1%Charles Creitz: 2.7%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice21.1%This article: 4.8%Charles Creitz: 0.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination4.8%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 0.1%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Charles Creitz: 2.6%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 1.2%Charles Creitz: 0.5%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…1.2%

692 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers33%attributed speech461writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 45 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 42 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJasmine Crockett • 12 words • 0.0% coverageJasmine Crockett • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageJasmine Crockett • 33 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJasmine Crockett • 38 words • 100.0% coverageJasmine Crockett • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageJasmine Crockett • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageAlveda King • 12 words • 0.0% coverageAlveda King • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageAlveda King • 17 words • 100.0% coverageAlveda King • 13 words • 0.0% coverageAlveda King • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 100.0% coverageAlveda King • 7 words • 0.0% coverageAlveda King • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverage
Selected voice

Jasmine Crockett

100%flagged-word coverage
154 attributed words67% of attributed speech75% writer coverage
0%17.5%35.0%Biased Writer Voice-31.7 ptsWriter: 31.7%Jasmine Crockett: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote+20.6 ptsWriter: 4.1%Jasmine Crockett: 24.7%24.7%Indoctrination+21.4 ptsWriter: 0.0%Jasmine Crockett: 21.4%21.4%Attempt to Sell a Product -1.7 ptsWriter: 1.7%Jasmine Crockett: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.