Topic summary
77% 10 analyzed articles/videos 5,736 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Race Relations results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Politically Right Leaning Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 5,060 hits . Analysis detected 38,305 faulty-reasoning hits from 26,672 analyzed words across 10 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,208 of 16,558 topics). This Race Relations is better (less manipulative) than 55.60% of the peer group. Race Relations
Topic details
Total words: 26,672
Article count: 10
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
44% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 44.4% percentile 2.7% BS Score10 analyzed articles26.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 8.8% 8.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 19.0% 19.0% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Topic 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.2% 3.2% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 13.6% 13.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.6%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 1.4% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Ad Hominem: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2% False Dilemma: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 1.5% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Straw Man: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst