Author summary
92% 4 analyzed articles/videos 2,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Eddie Scarry results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Right Leaning Bias , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 43.8% saturation with 3,941 hits . Analysis detected 23,084 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,007 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 86% (962 of 6,628 authors). This Eddie Scarry is worse (more manipulative) than 85.50% of the peer group. Eddie Scarry
Author details
Total words: 9,007
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
86% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 85.5% percentile 5.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 43.8% 43.8% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 28.8% 28.8% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.0% 7.0% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 19.1% 19.1% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 21.2% 21.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 10.4% 10.4% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Author 8.1% 8.1% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.1% 0.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 43.8%, sitewide 5.3% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 28.8%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect: Author 7.0%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.0%, sitewide 19.2% Hasty Generalization: Author 21.2%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Author 19.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 14.4%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 10.4%, sitewide 3.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Straw Man: Author 8.1%, sitewide 0.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Author 7.2%, sitewide 5.2% In-Group Bias: Author 5.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Author 5.4%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 4.8%, sitewide 2.7% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 4.1%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Horn Effect: Author 3.3%, sitewide 1.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst