Author summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Framing Effect , and Ad Hominem , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.8% saturation with 141 hits . Analysis detected 474 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,200 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,628 authors). This DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 1,200
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 11.8% 11.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Author 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 6.8% 6.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 3.4% 3.4% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Author 1.1% 1.1% Fundamental Attribution E… Sitewide 2.7% Author 3.4% 3.4% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Author 11.8%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst