Author summary
7% 2 analyzed articles/videos 995 analyzed words
BS Summary: These HANNAH SCHOENBAUM Associated Press results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Appeal to Authority , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 245 hits . Analysis detected 1,587 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,185 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.4% and a BS Rank of 8% (5,831 of 6,316 authors). This HANNAH SCHOENBAUM Associated Press is better (less manipulative) than 92.30% of the peer group. HANNAH SCHOENBAUM Associated Press
Author details
Total words: 4,185
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
8% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 7.7% percentile 1.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 5.5% 5.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 2.4% 2.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 5.8% 5.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 1.6% 1.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 3.1% 3.1% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 1.2% 1.2% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 1.1% 1.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 5.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 2.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 2.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Author 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Author 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Author 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 1.7%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Author 0.4%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 1.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 1.1%, sitewide 0.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 0.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst