Speaker summary
⁠84%2 analyzed articles/videos249 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jasmine Crockett results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, In-Group Bias, and False Dilemma, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 25.7% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 1,005.07 faulty-reasoning hits from 249 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 14.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠21% (20,545 of 25,889 speakers). This Jasmine Crockett is better (less manipulative) than 79.40% of the peer group.
Jasmine Crockett
Speaker details
Total words: 249
Content count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

21% percentile
025507510020.6% percentile
14.4% BS Score2 analyzed videos249 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 24.5%24.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 29.6%29.6%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Speaker 24.6%24.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Speaker 20.0%20.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Speaker 18.5%18.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 24.1%24.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 15.3%15.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 8.2%8.2%Tu QuoqueSitewide 0.2%Speaker 10.7%10.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 25.7%25.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%In-Group Bias: Speaker 29.6%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 25.7%, sitewide 15.9%Ad Hominem: Speaker 24.6%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 0.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 24.1%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 20.1%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 20.0%, sitewide 2.7%Negativity Bias: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Speaker 18.5%, sitewide 3.1%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 17.8%, sitewide 8.1%False Dilemma: Speaker 15.3%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 11.6%, sitewide 1.9%Tu Quoque: Speaker 10.7%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Speaker 9.9%, sitewide 0.7%Blind-Spot Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 0.2%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 9.4%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Speaker 8.2%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 7.9%, sitewide 5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%No True Scotsman: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 0.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos