Fox News98%

Karmelo Anthony APPEALS murder conviction after 35-year sentence 84%

6/11/2026, 11:30:14 AM

Topics: Video
Keywords: Youtube

BS Summary: This video contains 31 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and False Dilemma, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.6% saturation with 175 hits. Analysis detected 2,044 faulty-reasoning hits from 741 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 75.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (3,479 of 20,884 videos). This video is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the video peer group.

Carmelo Anthony appealing his murder conviction and sentence of 35 years in prison for stabbing and killing Austin 
Metaf at a track meet. 
Prosecutors say the appeal was expected and that the evidence is on their side. 
They also dispelled any concern that race was a factor. 
>> Frisco, Texas is a diverse community. 
The kids that were out there were diverse. Austin, Hunter, Metaf were good kids that had friends of all races. Uh 
Carmelo Anthony had friends of all 
races. So the case simply had nothing to do about race. 
It wasn't self-defense because two reasons. 
Basically, you can't provoke a difficulty with someone in Texas and then use it as an excuse to 
kill them. 
Another way to think about it is you can't if somebody throws a punch at you, you can't pull out a gun and shoot them. 
>> Joining us now is author and co-chair of Project 21, Horus Cooper. 
Horus, great to have you here in person. 
That said, we do head to an appeal now where seemingly the only argument on appeal is connected to race. 
The argument being that there were no black jurors. 
Will that argument work? 
So, this is a standard Batson claim that uh since the Supreme Court has ruled that if you are the accused and all of the permpter challenges that the prosecutors used eliminated a person of the same race as the accused, you can ask the question as to why that occurred. 
But what actually happened here is that teachers were challenged. 
Now, If you're going to say that if you're a black teacher, you get to stay on the jury. 
But if you're a white teacher, you're not going to be able to stay on the jury even though it was recognized that a teacher might not 
look at this case the way the law requires. 
>> That that's such a good point and I think that is what makes this argument on appeal about to fail and I think we need to be clear-minded on that. 
Another reason I think things went so well in this courtroom, the judge did a spectacular job of keeping this courtroom from from really getting infected with the undercurrent of race. 
One individual who did not do the same, of course, is Jasmine Crockett. Nor did she seem to understand the facts of the case. Watch this. 
If a 300 pound man is beating me like on top of me and beating me down, I I'm not limited to to fist. 
>> So, just to be clear, Metaf was not 300 lb. He wasn't beating down on anyone. 
And not that this was a fight because it's clearly been acknowledged in court that it was not a fight, but under the law, you are limited in a fist fight to just using your fist. 
You cannot use a knife. 
What's your message to Jasmine Crockett? 
>> Miss Crockett misses the limelight and she is willing to stir up a lot of racial animous in Texas as a way to keep herself in the limelight. 
There are no actual racial elements associated with this case. 
Here's the real story. I grew up in Texas. 
If an incident like this that occurred, your parents' job was to take you right down to the sheriff's office and let you plea and admit to this. 
His refusal to plea and admit to this has resulted in a staggering 35ear sentence. 
But if you make the prosecutor prove a slam dunk case, this is what you get. 
Question that I don't hear a lot of people talking about, and we need to be quick on this. 
this. It's a hailmary question. 
In light of what you just said, the fact that he did not go to the court to plea, maybe his lawyers told him not to. 
Could you see an ineffective assistance of counsel argument being made here to invalidate the conviction? 
>> Absolutely not. 
None of these claims are going to work. 
And it's a shame that doing the right thing wasn't what the mom and dad in this family wanted to do. 
>> Horus Cooper, thank you so much for your time and your insight. 
Very much appreciate it. 
Be sure to like and subscribe for all the Fox News latest on 
YouTube and catch full shows streaming now on Fox 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 8.9%Fox Nation: 4.1%Confirmation Bias8.9%This article: 5.9%Fox Nation: 1.2%Anchoring Bias5.9%This article: 13.8%Fox Nation: 3.6%Availability Heuristic13.8%This article: 11.7%Fox Nation: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic11.7%This article: 3.5%Fox Nation: 0.9%Hindsight Bias3.5%This article: 12.0%Fox Nation: 3.1%Overconfidence Bias12.0%This article: 17.4%Fox Nation: 12.0%Framing Effect17.4%This article: 2.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Loss Aversion2.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.9%Status Quo Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 2.8%Optimism Bias0.9%This article: 5.3%Fox Nation: 1.7%Pessimism Bias5.3%This article: 23.6%Fox Nation: 10.9%Negativity Bias23.6%This article: 4.2%Fox Nation: 2.7%Self-Serving Bias4.2%This article: 8.8%Fox Nation: 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error8.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.2%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 3.6%Fox Nation: 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias3.6%This article: 7.8%Fox Nation: 2.9%Halo Effect7.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 1.8%Fox Nation: 0.5%Primacy Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 8.1%Fox Nation: 2.5%Ad Hominem8.1%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.7%Straw Man0.0%This article: 15.4%Fox Nation: 5.1%Appeal to Authority15.4%This article: 17.7%Fox Nation: 1.8%False Dilemma17.7%This article: 5.5%Fox Nation: 1.1%Slippery Slope5.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 13.0%Fox Nation: 6.1%Hasty Generalization13.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.6%Red Herring0.0%This article: 2.6%Fox Nation: 0.8%Bandwagon2.6%This article: 22.1%Fox Nation: 7.8%Appeal to Emotion22.1%This article: 5.9%Fox Nation: 1.3%Begging the Question5.9%This article: 5.5%Fox Nation: 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)5.5%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Burden of Proof13.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%Composition/Division0.9%This article: 20.2%Fox Nation: 2.4%Anecdotal20.2%This article: 0.9%Fox Nation: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.9%This article: 12.0%Fox Nation: 1.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)12.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.1%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.2%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 1.2%Fox Nation: 0.6%Genetic Fallacy1.2%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.7%Unattributed Quote0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 6.2%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 0.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 3.4%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Fox Nation: 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

741 words analyzed.

Speakers

2speakers4.9%attributed speech705writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageProsecutors • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 18 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 2 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 51 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 9 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 16 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 8 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 13 words • 0.0% coverageFox News • 9 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Prosecutors

100%flagged-word coverage
14 attributed words39% of attributed speech96% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.