Author summary
0% 2 analyzed articles/videos 369 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Choi results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Availability Heuristic , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 29.4% saturation with 434 hits . Analysis detected 1,999 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,476 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of 87% (837 of 6,418 authors). This Matthew Choi is worse (more manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group. Matthew Choi
Author details
Total words: 1,476
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
87% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 87.0% percentile 5.9% BS Score2 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 18.1% 18.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 6.1% 6.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.6% 1.6% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 6.8% 6.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 3.3% 3.3% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.9% 0.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 3.7% 3.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 29.4% 29.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Author 3.0% 3.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 29.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 18.8%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 18.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 7.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 3.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 6.9% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 6.8%, sitewide 1.4% Halo Effect: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Anchoring Bias: Author 5.2%, sitewide 4.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.5%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Author 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst