Author summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 432 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Goodwin results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Anecdotal , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 560 hits . Analysis detected 3,001 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,204 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of 84% (1,088 of 6,498 authors). This Liz Goodwin is worse (more manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group. Liz Goodwin
Author details
Total words: 2,204
Article count: 4
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
83% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 83.3% percentile 5.0% BS Score4 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Author 15.7% 15.7% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 17.6% 17.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 3.2% 3.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 25.4% 25.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 10.5% 10.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Author 0.6% 0.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 3.1% 3.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 17.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 25.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 7.6%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Author 15.7%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Author 3.2%, sitewide 11.1% Biased Writer Voice: Author 10.5%, sitewide 5.3% Availability Heuristic: Author 9.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Author 8.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 3.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Ad Hominem: Author 3.4%, sitewide 2.2% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Loss Aversion: Author 3.2%, sitewide 2.5% Primacy Effect: Author 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Recency Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Quote-first Misdirection: Author 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst