Speaker summary
65% 61 analyzed articles/videos 3,280.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Hakeem Jeffries results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14.8% saturation with 574.033 hits . Analysis detected 6,883.773 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,280.667 analyzed words across 61 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 2% (26,316 of 26,730 speakers). This Hakeem Jeffries is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Hakeem Jeffries
Speaker details
Total words: 3,280.667
Article count: 61
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 4.1% BS Score61 analyzed videos3.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 14.8% 14.8% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Speaker 12.1% 12.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 1.0% 1.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 8.5% 8.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 3.5% 3.5% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 7.5% 7.5% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Speaker 8.7% 8.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 14.3% 14.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Speaker 1.9% 1.9% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Speaker 5.5% 5.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Speaker 14.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Speaker 14.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.2%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 8.1% Ad Hominem: Speaker 12.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 1.0%, sitewide 9.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Speaker 8.7%, sitewide 2.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 8.5%, sitewide 0.8% In-Group Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 6.9% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 3.6%, sitewide 7.5% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 7.5%, sitewide 0.0% Halo Effect: Speaker 1.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Unattributed Quote: Speaker 5.5%, sitewide 1.1% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 1.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 3.3%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Speaker 4.3%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 2.5%, sitewide 4.0% Begging the Question: Speaker 3.9%, sitewide 1.7% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Straw Man: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst