Author summary
16%2 analyzed articles/videos653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jarrell Dillard results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 211 hits. Analysis detected 1,414 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,223 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of 66% (2,138 of 6,169 authors). This Jarrell Dillard is worse (more manipulative) than 65.40% of the peer group.
Jarrell Dillard
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
66%Jarrell Dillard (selected)4%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
Author details
Total words: 2,223
Article count: 2
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

65% percentile
025507510065.4% percentile
3.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 9.5%9.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 7.0%7.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 1.4%1.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.9%6.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Author 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Author 4.0%4.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Author 4.9%4.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 4.7%4.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Author 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Author 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Author 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Author 4.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Author 4.2%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Author 4.9%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Author 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Author 4.0%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Author 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Author 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Author 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Author 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Author 0.3%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos