UPI.com64%

House passes bill to fund the government through midterm elections 56%

By Lisa Hornung72%

7/22/2026, 1:38:33 PM

BS Summary: This article contains 27 faulty reasoning types, including Politically Left Leaning Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 31.4% saturation with 170 hits. Analysis detected 1,385 faulty-reasoning hits from 541 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 53.7% and a BS Rank of 56% (9,119 of 20,516 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 55.60% of the article peer group.

House Republicans pushed through a spending bill that would fund the government through early December in an effort to avoid a shutdown just before the midterm elections. 
The bill, which passed on Tuesday, is similar to what they would pass just before the Sept. 30 deadline. 
It passed 220-205 almost along party lines, though six Democrats in battleground districts voted for it, and one Republican voted against it. 
"They've shown there's nothing they love more than a government shutdown, as tens of millions of Americans head to the polls in November," Speaker Mike Johnson. 
R-La., said at a press conference. 
"But this clean [continuing resolution] is an opportunity for both sides." 
Representatives Kathy Castor, D-Fla; Henry Cuellar, D-Texas; Don Davis, D-N.C.; Jared Golden, D-Maine; Vicente Gonzalez, D-Texas; and Gabe Vasquez, D-N.M., voted with Republicans. 
One Republican, Rep. 
Thomas Massie, R-Ky., voted against it. 
"If the Democrats can't support this basic principle, then they alone are going to own the chaos that ensues if the government shuts down after Sept. 30th," Johnson said Tuesday. 
It's not clear if it has much of a chance to pass the Senate. 
Republican leader Sen. 
John Thune, R-S.D., told reporters Tuesday that he would try to get a spending bill to a vote before the five-week recess in August. 
But it may have to wait until lawmakers return in September. 
Multiple Senate Republicans have said they do not support the House's $95 billion package and don't believe it will make it through the Senate, The Washington Post reported. 
It would need at least seven Democrats to pass in the nearly evenly divided chamber. 
House Democratic leaders said in a statement before the vote they planned to vote against the measure because it would give President Donald Trump's administration "even more power over the federal budget and fails to block funding for Donald Trump's violent mass deportation machine." 
Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass, and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif., said in the statement, "Their my-way-or-the-highway approach has consistently failed to address the high cost of living or meet the needs of the American people. 
This continuing resolution is a premature and desperate attempt by Republicans to abdicate their responsibility to govern while there are still several months left to negotiate a bipartisan agreement. 
We will be voting No." 
Rep. 
Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., the top Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, said lawmakers should focus on the 12 annual spending bills that would normally pass to fund the government instead of a stopgap measure. 
"If I am going to support a continuing resolution, it needs to continue government operations, exclude any poison pills, and it must maintain Congress's constitutional authority over spending decisions," The New York Times reported DeLauro said. 
"At this time, the continuing resolution does not meet that standard." 
The 12 spending bills are in the works in both chambers, but Republican party infighting and battles over defense spending have slowed the process. 
"After Senate Democrats forced the two longest government shutdowns in American history and abandoned previously negotiated funding agreements more than once, we have every reason to act early, and every responsibility to do so," Rep. 
Tom Cole, R-Okla., said. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 22.4%Lisa Hornung: 7.5%UPI: 6.3%Confirmation Bias22.4%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 5.2%Lisa Hornung: 1.7%UPI: 1.6%Availability Heuristic5.2%This article: 3.5%Lisa Hornung: 1.2%UPI: 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic3.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 2.6%Lisa Hornung: 0.9%UPI: 0.4%Overconfidence Bias2.6%This article: 12.0%Lisa Hornung: 4.7%UPI: 8.6%Framing Effect12.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 6.1%Lisa Hornung: 3.8%UPI: 3.0%Status Quo Bias6.1%This article: 4.4%Lisa Hornung: 1.5%UPI: 0.7%Sunk Cost Effect4.4%This article: 4.4%Lisa Hornung: 1.5%UPI: 0.7%Optimism Bias4.4%This article: 5.5%Lisa Hornung: 1.8%UPI: 2.9%Pessimism Bias5.5%This article: 31.4%Lisa Hornung: 13.0%UPI: 10.7%Negativity Bias31.4%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 1.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 1.8%UPI: 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 4.8%Lisa Hornung: 3.8%UPI: 2.9%In-Group Bias4.8%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.8%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 2.7%UPI: 1.4%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 6.5%Lisa Hornung: 2.2%UPI: 1.1%Recency Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 5.4%Lisa Hornung: 1.8%UPI: 7.5%Ad Hominem5.4%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 4.1%UPI: 3.5%Straw Man0.0%This article: 5.2%Lisa Hornung: 1.7%UPI: 1.1%Appeal to Authority5.2%This article: 5.5%Lisa Hornung: 3.7%UPI: 2.9%False Dilemma5.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 1.8%UPI: 0.9%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 14.0%Lisa Hornung: 12.8%UPI: 9.3%Hasty Generalization14.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 2.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 20.5%Lisa Hornung: 23.8%UPI: 20.5%Appeal to Emotion20.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 3.4%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 12.0%Lisa Hornung: 4.0%UPI: 3.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)12.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 2.2%UPI: 1.1%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 13.7%Lisa Hornung: 4.6%UPI: 2.3%Burden of Proof13.7%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 2.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.7%UPI: 0.3%No True Scotsman2.0%This article: 8.1%Lisa Hornung: 2.7%UPI: 2.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation)8.1%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 6.7%Lisa Hornung: 2.2%UPI: 1.1%Special Pleading6.7%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 2.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.7%UPI: 1.1%Unattributed Quote2.0%This article: 4.8%Lisa Hornung: 9.2%UPI: 6.7%Quote-first Misdirection4.8%This article: 13.5%Lisa Hornung: 4.5%UPI: 4.1%Biased Writer Voice13.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.9%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 27.2%Lisa Hornung: 16.1%UPI: 8.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias27.2%This article: 6.5%Lisa Hornung: 6.6%UPI: 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias6.5%This article: 0.0%Lisa Hornung: 0.0%UPI: 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

541 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers46%attributed speech294writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 10 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 22 words • 0.0% coverageSpeaker Mike Johnson • 26 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSpeaker Mike Johnson • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 6 words • 0.0% coverageSpeaker Mike Johnson • 30 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 3 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 44 words • 100.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 41 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coverageRosa DeLauro • 33 words • 100.0% coverageRosa DeLauro • 36 words • 0.0% coverageThe New York Times • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageTom Cole • 35 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 4 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hakeem Jeffries

100%flagged-word coverage
41 attributed words17% of attributed speech57% writer coverage
0%50.0%100.0%Politically Left Leaning B+75.2 ptsWriter: 24.8%Hakeem Jeffries: 100.0%100.0%Biased Writer Voice-24.8 ptsWriter: 24.8%Hakeem Jeffries: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.