Topic summary
66%55 analyzed articles/videos34,463 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midterm Elections results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 19,501 hits. Analysis detected 196,322 faulty-reasoning hits from 205,765 analyzed words across 55 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of 16% (13,976 of 16,558 topics). This Midterm Elections is better (less manipulative) than 84.40% of the peer group.

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

16% percentile
025507510015.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score55 analyzed articles205.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.5%9.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.6%4.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 5.3%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos

How to run for reelection in a messy Congress? It's not easy61%
WRAL.com56%By LISA MASCARO — AP Congressional Correspondent83%7/25/2026, 12:18:11 PM
New AARP poll: Older voters hold the key to Georgia's top 2026 races32%
FOX 5 Atlanta45%7/24/2026, 9:42:43 PM
Federal judges allow new Tennessee congressional map that splits majority-Black district in Memphis31%
WTOP32%By WTOP Staff29%7/24/2026, 12:05:49 AM
Federal judges allow new Tennessee congressional map9%
ABC News22%By DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press0% HANNAH SCHOENBAUM Associated Press8%7/23/2026, 11:59:17 PM
The Roadblocks on Democrats’ Path to Retaking the House in 202675%
KQED61%By Marisa Lagos87% Guy Marzorati71%7/23/2026, 11:05:00 PM
House passes bill to fund the government through midterm elections57%
UPI.com66%By Lisa Hornung72%7/22/2026, 1:38:33 PM
Transcript: Trump Iran Tirade Goes Nuclear as GOP Midterm Panic Grows64%
The New Republic72%By The Daily Blast68% Greg Sargent73%7/22/2026, 10:51:15 AM
Trump considers cutting bait on Iran war to try to save the midterms: report92%
Raw Story93%By Matthew Chapman86%7/22/2026, 12:47:42 AM
White House insiders deliver GOP stark midterm message: Trump literally 'doesn't care'98%
Raw Story93%By Alexander Willis88%7/21/2026, 12:44:48 PM
This fury is ripping at its chains — and if it breaks free the GOP is finished94%
Rawstory93%By Jason Miciak97%7/21/2026, 12:33:35 PM