Author summary
97% 3 analyzed articles/videos 1,582 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Jason Miciak results contain 47 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Indoctrination , and Biased Writer Voice , with Politically Left Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 25.5% saturation with 3,050 hits . Analysis detected 23,801 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,948 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of 78% (1,459 of 6,357 authors). This Jason Miciak is worse (more manipulative) than 77.10% of the peer group. Jason Miciak
Author details
Total words: 11,948
Article count: 3
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
77% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 77.1% percentile 4.2% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Politically Left Leaning … Sitewide 2.0% Author 25.5% 25.5% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 19.4% 19.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 7.6% 7.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 23.6% 23.6% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 16.4% 16.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 1.5% 1.5% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Author 10.5% 10.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Author 4.3% 4.3% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Author 6.1% 6.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 25.5%, sitewide 2.0% Hasty Generalization: Author 23.6%, sitewide 8.1% Indoctrination: Author 19.4%, sitewide 0.0% Negativity Bias: Author 15.5%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Author 16.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Author 13.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Author 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Author 10.5%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Author 9.5%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.3%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 6.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% False Dilemma: Author 6.1%, sitewide 1.5% Optimism Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Author 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 3.9%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 3.3%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Author 3.2%, sitewide 1.9% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Author 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst