Keyword summary
77% 89 analyzed articles/videos 56,077 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Midterm Elections results contain 55 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.9% saturation with 30,612 hits . Analysis detected 265,112 faulty-reasoning hits from 279,814 analyzed words across 88 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (31,745 of 37,316 keywords). This Midterm Elections is better (less manipulative) than 85.10% of the peer group. Midterm Elections
Keyword details
Total words: 279,814
Article count: 88
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.9% percentile 1.7% BS Score88 analyzed articles279.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.9% 10.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.2% 6.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.7% 3.7% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst