MS NOW95%

‘His patience is running out’: Team Trump intensifies fight against GOP’s John Thune 77%

By Steve Benen95%

7/24/2026, 6:02:15 AM

BS Summary: This article contains 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Pessimism Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 136 hits. Analysis detected 1,173 faulty-reasoning hits from 722 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 68.7% and a BS Rank of 77% (5,066 of 21,887 articles). This article is worse (more manipulative) than 76.90% of the article peer group.

There’s one word Donald Trump clearly doesn’t like to hear: “No.” 
And yet, it’s precisely what Senate Majority Leader John Thune has been forced to tell the president quite a bit over the last year or so  not because the South Dakota Republican necessarily disagrees with the White House’s agenda, but because Thune hasn’t had the votes to give Trump everything he wants. 
One GOP senator, who requested anonymity to discuss the internal dynamics, told MS NOW last month that Trump and Thune “have an awkward relationship.” 
The lawmaker added, “It’s awkward for everybody.” 
This is especially true of the president’s top legislative priority, a sweeping voter suppression package he’s labeled the SAVE America Act that Republicans have already conceded they can’t pass. 
Trump, apparently furious by Congress’ inability to meet his demands, has increasingly turned against his own party’s Senate leader. 
During a campaign-style event in Georgia this week, the president told supporters , “[House Speaker] Mike Johnson and Congress have done a great job, but we’re having a hard time in the Senate. 
The Senate, what they’re doing, it’s just not right.” 
The Republican added, “It’s like the Senate is where you send things you want them to die. 
We’re not going to be able to take it much longer.” 
He didn’t elaborate as to what would happen after he’s no longer content to “take it,” though Trump specifically told attendees to “call John Thune” and demand that the GOP-led Senate pass the president’s anti-voting legislation. 
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt echoed the message during Thursday’s briefing. 
Leavitt on Trump's views on Thune: "His patience is running out" 
- Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) 2026-07-23T15:46:36.874Z 
Asked about the president’s perspective on the Senate majority leader, Leavitt told reporters that Trump’s “patience is running out” with Thune. 
(She also didn’t say what would happen when the president’s patience does run out.) 
The mild-mannered South Dakotan struggled to hide his aggravation when asked for a reaction to Leavitt’s comments. 
“Maybe she or somebody else ought to get on the phone and get the votes,” Thune told reporters on Capitol Hill. 
Referring to the legislative arithmetic, the Senate majority leader added, “It’s 50 around here. 
And, so, instead of pointing the finger at Republicans, they might think about going after the people who are stopping it on the floor, which is the Democrats.” 
For those familiar with Thune and his career, this is about as publicly angry as he gets. 
What’s more, while history is filled with examples of presidents clashing privately with Senate majority leaders, it’s extraordinary to see the White House launch this kind of public offensive against Thune. 
Whether the White House understands this or not, Thune is not Trump’s problem. 
Under the Senate’s rules, the president’s voter suppression plan would need 60 votes to advance. 
Trump’s solution to this is to eliminate the filibuster rule, but (a) Thune doesn’t have the votes to make that happen; and (b) even if he did, the anti-voting bill still wouldn’t have the votes to pass. 
The president’s “patience” with the majority leader, in other words, is irrelevant: Trump could try to orchestrate Thune’s ouster, but his successor would tell the president the same thing. 
With this in mind, a variety of GOP senators are rallying behind Thune , exacerbating tensions between Trump and his own party’s Senate conference roughly 100 days before the midterm elections. 
“I don’t know who it was that sold the president on this idea, that this was obtainable, but it’s creating a circular firing squad for Republicans,” Sen. 
John Cornyn of Texas told Politico . 
Stepping back, I’m mindful of the fact that Trump reflexively looks for someone to blame after failure. 
He pushed for a radical anti-voting proposal; it’s not going well, so he needs a fall guy who isn’t him. 
Holding Thune responsible is convenient, even if it doesn’t make sense. 
But it’s also a sign of things to come: If the GOP struggles in the midterm elections in November, the White House has already laid the groundwork: The president will effectively, if not literally, declare, “Don’t blame me; it’s Thune’s fault.” 
The post ‘His patience is running out’: Team Trump intensifies fight against GOP’s John Thune appeared first on MS NOW . 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 4.6%Steve Benen: 10.5%MS NOW: 7.5%Confirmation Bias4.6%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.2%Anchoring Bias0.0%This article: 3.3%Steve Benen: 3.7%MS NOW: 3.7%Availability Heuristic3.3%This article: 4.3%Steve Benen: 0.9%MS NOW: 1.1%Representativeness Heuristic4.3%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.3%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 10.8%Steve Benen: 3.1%MS NOW: 2.6%Overconfidence Bias10.8%This article: 1.8%Steve Benen: 23.0%MS NOW: 15.4%Framing Effect1.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.4%MS NOW: 0.7%Loss Aversion0.0%This article: 4.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.9%Status Quo Bias4.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.3%MS NOW: 2.4%Optimism Bias0.0%This article: 11.2%Steve Benen: 3.1%MS NOW: 3.2%Pessimism Bias11.2%This article: 17.0%Steve Benen: 29.0%MS NOW: 19.2%Negativity Bias17.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.1%MS NOW: 2.4%Self-Serving Bias0.0%This article: 6.2%Steve Benen: 4.7%MS NOW: 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error6.2%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.3%MS NOW: 0.3%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.4%MS NOW: 3.5%In-Group Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 3.2%MS NOW: 2.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 2.4%Steve Benen: 0.9%MS NOW: 2.2%Halo Effect2.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 4.4%MS NOW: 1.8%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 5.8%Steve Benen: 2.9%MS NOW: 1.8%Recency Bias5.8%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 7.8%MS NOW: 4.7%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 1.3%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 6.3%MS NOW: 5.4%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 9.0%Steve Benen: 1.6%MS NOW: 2.2%False Dilemma9.0%This article: 12.0%Steve Benen: 1.7%MS NOW: 2.2%Slippery Slope12.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 7.9%Steve Benen: 8.9%MS NOW: 8.1%Hasty Generalization7.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.7%MS NOW: 0.7%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 1.2%MS NOW: 0.9%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 1.2%Steve Benen: 11.3%MS NOW: 9.8%Appeal to Emotion1.2%This article: 1.8%Steve Benen: 3.5%MS NOW: 2.4%Begging the Question1.8%This article: 7.1%Steve Benen: 3.3%MS NOW: 3.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)7.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.8%MS NOW: 0.6%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 2.9%Steve Benen: 1.4%MS NOW: 0.9%Burden of Proof2.9%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.1%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 7.1%Steve Benen: 2.0%MS NOW: 2.6%Anecdotal7.1%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.2%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 1.5%Steve Benen: 1.9%MS NOW: 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)1.5%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.0%MS NOW: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.1%MS NOW: 0.1%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.5%MS NOW: 0.3%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.3%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 2.2%MS NOW: 1.3%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 9.3%Steve Benen: 3.8%MS NOW: 2.5%Unattributed Quote9.3%This article: 6.1%Steve Benen: 2.6%MS NOW: 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection6.1%This article: 18.8%Steve Benen: 22.9%MS NOW: 14.2%Biased Writer Voice18.8%This article: 3.9%Steve Benen: 1.4%MS NOW: 2.1%Indoctrination3.9%This article: 2.4%Steve Benen: 8.6%MS NOW: 5.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias2.4%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.6%MS NOW: 0.6%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Steve Benen: 0.2%MS NOW: 0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

722 words analyzed.

Speakers

4speakers24%attributed speech549writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 13 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 53 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 7 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 33 words • 100.0% coverageDonald Trump • 9 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 17 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 11 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 100.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 12 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageKaroline Leavitt • 21 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 14 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageJohn Thune • 21 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 14 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 28 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 15 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 37 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 29 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 31 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 27 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Cornyn • 7 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 17 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 20 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 41 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 21 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Donald Trump

100%flagged-word coverage
70 attributed words40% of attributed speech93% writer coverage
0%25.0%50.0%Quote-first Misdirection+45.1 ptsWriter: 2.0%Donald Trump: 47.1%47.1%Biased Writer Voice-24.8 ptsWriter: 24.8%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Unattributed Quote-12.2 ptsWriter: 12.2%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Indoctrination-5.1 ptsWriter: 5.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%Politically Left Leaning B-3.1 ptsWriter: 3.1%Donald Trump: 0.0%0.0%

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.