Keyword summary
69% 6 analyzed articles/videos 5,438 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Filibuster results contain 54 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Hasty Generalization , and Confirmation Bias , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.6% saturation with 1,887 hits . Analysis detected 22,692 faulty-reasoning hits from 21,967 analyzed words across 6 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,454 of 37,369 keywords). This Filibuster is better (less manipulative) than 78.80% of the peer group. Filibuster
Keyword details
Total words: 21,967
Article count: 6
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.2% percentile 1.9% BS Score6 analyzed articles22K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 7.6% 7.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.6% 3.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 1.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 4.6% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 3.1% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst