Author summary
86% 2 analyzed articles/videos 798 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Francesca Cella results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Politically Right Leaning Bias as the most egregious example at 18.9% saturation with 857 hits . Analysis detected 8,175 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,524 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of 79% (1,361 of 6,382 authors). This Francesca Cella is worse (more manipulative) than 78.70% of the peer group. Francesca Cella
Author details
Total words: 4,524
Article count: 2
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 78.7% percentile 4.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 4.1% 4.1% Politically Right Leaning… Sitewide 1.4% Author 18.9% 18.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 17.9% 17.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Author 11.2% 11.2% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Author 6.3% 6.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 1.4% 1.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 14.0% 14.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Author 8.0% 8.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.5% 6.5% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Author 4.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Author 14.0%, sitewide 19.2% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Author 18.9%, sitewide 1.4% Hasty Generalization: Author 17.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Emotion: Author 12.4%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 11.2%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 6.2%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Author 8.7%, sitewide 7.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 8.0%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 6.9%, sitewide 2.7% In-Group Bias: Author 6.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 1.4%, sitewide 6.7% Indoctrination: Author 6.3%, sitewide 0.0% Optimism Bias: Author 1.5%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Author 5.9%, sitewide 5.3% Ad Hominem: Author 5.5%, sitewide 2.2% Anecdotal: Author 5.2%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Author 4.6%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 4.0% Unattributed Quote: Author 3.9%, sitewide 1.1% Self-Serving Bias: Author 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Slippery Slope: Author 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst