Topic summary
92% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,271 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Political Infighting results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 700 hits . Analysis detected 4,740 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,813 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 61% (6,480 of 16,562 topics). This Political Infighting is worse (more manipulative) than 60.90% of the peer group. Political Infighting
Topic details
Total words: 3,813
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
61% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 60.9% percentile 3.6% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 18.4% 18.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 11.1% 11.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Unattributed Quote Sitewide 1.1% Topic 6.3% 6.3% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 2.8% 2.8% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.1% Anecdotal: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 5.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 2.0% Slippery Slope: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.7% Recency Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.1% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 0.0% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.4% Ad Hominem: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst