Author summary
ā 96% 1 analyzed article/video 1,349 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate Burns results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Confirmation Bias , and Negativity Bias , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 39.9% saturation with 1,614 hits . Analysis detected 6,263 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,047 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.4% and a BS Rank of ā 79% (1,395 of 6,628 authors). This Kate Burns is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group. Kate Burns
Author details
Total words: 4,047
Article count: 1
Publications
Ranking context Position among analyzed authors
79% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 79.0% percentile 4.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Author 39.9% 39.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Author 6.8% 6.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Author 24.7% 24.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Author 2.2% 2.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Author 15.9% 15.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Author 11.0% 11.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Author 0.4% 0.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Author 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Author 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Author 6.0% 6.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Author 39.9%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Author 6.8%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Author 24.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Author 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Author 2.2%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Author 15.9%, sitewide 7.5% Appeal to Authority: Author 6.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Author 4.2%, sitewide 9.1% In-Group Bias: Author 0.8%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Author 0.4%, sitewide 6.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 5.3%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Author 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Author 0.1%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 3.6%, sitewide 2.0% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Author 2.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Author 2.9%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Author 2.5%, sitewide 1.7% Loss Aversion: Author 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Author 2.2%, sitewide 1.9% Ad Hominem: Author 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Author rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst