Keyword summary
47%2 analyzed articles/videos1,459 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Henry Cuellar results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Politically Left Leaning Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.4% saturation with 675 hits. Analysis detected 3,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,377 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,543 of 37,338 keywords). This Henry Cuellar is better (less manipulative) than 60.40% of the peer group.
Henry Cuellar
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
40%Henry Cuellar (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,377
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.6% percentile
2.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.4%15.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 2.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.4%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos