BS Summary: This article contains 15 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Self-Serving Bias, and In-Group Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 155 hits. Analysis detected 800 faulty-reasoning hits from 653 analyzed words, generating a BS Score of 46.2% and a BS Rank of 42% (11,995 of 20,447 articles). This article is better (less manipulative) than 58.70% of the article peer group.

WASHINGTON -- The House passed a stopgap bill to fund the government into December in an effort to avoid another government shutdown weeks before the midterms, but the effort faces an uphill climb in the Senate. 
The resolution, which would fund the government through Dec. 4, passed 220-205. 
House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., pushed the measure to preempt a showdown with Democrats in the fall over government funding as lawmakers are unlikely to meet a Sept. 30 deadline ahead of the new fiscal year. 
Internal divisions among Republicans in the House -- and a standoff between Democrat and GOP appropriators in the Senate over defense spending -- has left lawmakers behind on passing the necessary 12 appropriations bills. 
A shutdown before the midterms could potentially reflect poorly upon Republicans, as the party controls the White House and both chambers of Congress. 
While stopgap measures normally garner bipartisan support, the House bill drew backlash from a majority of Democrats on Tuesday. 
In a statement ahead of the vote, House Democratic leaders -- Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.; Minority Whip Katherine Clark, D-Mass.; and Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, D-Calif. -- said they would not be voting for the stopgap measure because it gives the Trump administration "even more power over the federal budget and fails to block funding for (President) Donald Trump's violent mass deportation machine." 
The House-passed stopgap bill is a nonstarter in the Senate, where Republicans would need the support of at least seven Democrats to advance it. 
Sen. 
Patty Murray, D-Wash., the lead Democrat on the Appropriations Committee, told The Washington Post on Tuesday that she opposes the House resolution and is instead working with Appropriations Chair Susan Collins, R-Maine, to draft their own bill to temporarily extend government funding. 
Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-S.D., said he'll bring a bipartisan agreement to fund the government to the floor before the August break. 
That measure would then need to be approved by the House when lawmakers return at the end of August before it goes to Trump's desk. 
House Republicans are already laying the blame on Democrats if the Senate fails to pass a stopgap funding bill, arguing Democratic opposition to the House-passed resolution would be responsible for a shutdown. 
"If the Democrats can't support this basic principle, then they alone are going to own the chaos that ensues if the government shuts down after Sept. 
30," Johnson said Tuesday. 
House Republicans will next proceed to advancing another budget priority, a framework for a $95 billion reconciliation package that Republicans could pass without Democratic support. 
The framework authorizes $10 billion for election-related measures, $12 billion for American farmers grappling with the impacts of tariffs and inflation, and $73 billion for the Pentagon as it runs urgently low on cash largely due to the Iran war. 
House GOP leaders hope to vote on the framework later this week with the goal of passing the legislation before the midterms, despite pushback from some members of their own conference and Senate Republicans. 
Trump administration officials, including Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, met with House Republicans on Tuesday to press them on moving the framework forward. 
Trump has demanded Republicans pass a third reconciliation package that he originally wanted to include $350 billion for defense spending and the SAVE America Act, which would impose stricter requirements for voting. 
The White House also requested $20 billion in aid for farmers. 
While the $95 billion package is much narrower than what Trump originally requested, he urged House Republicans in a Truth Social post on Monday "to VOTE YES" on the framework. 
One of the top concerns among fiscally conservative Republicans is that the bill does not include any budget cuts to offset new spending, something they demanded to avoid driving the nation's $39 trillion debt figure higher. 
Information for this article was contributed by Theodoric Meyer of The Washington Post. 
Article reasoning-pattern comparisonThis article: 6.4%Jarrell Dillard: 1.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.5%Confirmation Bias6.4%This article: 4.9%Jarrell Dillard: 2.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.0%Anchoring Bias4.9%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.4%Availability Heuristic0.0%This article: 2.9%Jarrell Dillard: 0.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.6%Representativeness Heuristic2.9%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Hindsight Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.4%Overconfidence Bias0.0%This article: 4.6%Jarrell Dillard: 9.5%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 8.7%Framing Effect4.6%This article: 5.5%Jarrell Dillard: 1.6%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.4%Loss Aversion5.5%This article: 3.8%Jarrell Dillard: 1.1%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.7%Status Quo Bias3.8%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Sunk Cost Effect0.0%This article: 14.2%Jarrell Dillard: 4.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 3.3%Optimism Bias14.2%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.7%Pessimism Bias0.0%This article: 23.7%Jarrell Dillard: 7.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 9.0%Negativity Bias23.7%This article: 10.4%Jarrell Dillard: 4.5%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 5.0%Self-Serving Bias10.4%This article: 9.2%Jarrell Dillard: 2.7%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.3%Fundamental Attribution Error9.2%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.1%Actor-Observer Bias0.0%This article: 9.8%Jarrell Dillard: 4.7%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 5.2%In-Group Bias9.8%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.3%Halo Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Horn Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Dunning-Kruger Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.8%Recency Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Primacy Effect0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Blind-Spot Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.4%Ad Hominem0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.8%Straw Man0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 1.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.2%Appeal to Authority0.0%This article: 7.7%Jarrell Dillard: 4.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 3.1%False Dilemma7.7%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 1.2%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.6%Slippery Slope0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.2%Circular Reasoning0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 3.6%Hasty Generalization0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Red Herring0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Bandwagon0.0%This article: 9.8%Jarrell Dillard: 6.9%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 8.8%Appeal to Emotion9.8%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.5%Begging the Question0.0%This article: 4.9%Jarrell Dillard: 2.8%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause)4.9%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Tu Quoque0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.1%Burden of Proof0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Appeal to Nature0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.2%Composition/Division0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.9%Anecdotal0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%No True Scotsman0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Gambler’s Fallacy0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Middle Ground0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Personal Incredulity0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.1%Special Pleading0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Genetic Fallacy0.0%This article: 4.6%Jarrell Dillard: 1.3%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.9%Unattributed Quote4.6%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 4.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 1.6%Quote-first Misdirection0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 2.4%Biased Writer Voice0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Indoctrination0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.8%Politically Left Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias0.0%This article: 0.0%Jarrell Dillard: 0.0%Arkansas Democrat-Gazette: 0.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or S…0.0%

653 words analyzed.

Speakers

6speakers38%attributed speech402writer words
Voice mapSelect a segment to jump to its words
Writer's voice • 5 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 12 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 19 words • 0.0% coverageHakeem Jeffries • 64 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 24 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 1 words • 0.0% coveragePatty Murray • 42 words • 0.0% coverageJohn Thune • 23 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 26 words • 0.0% coverageMike Johnson • 4 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 25 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 40 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 34 words • 0.0% coverageRussell Vought • 26 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 32 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 11 words • 0.0% coverageDonald Trump • 30 words • 100.0% coverageWriter's voice • 36 words • 0.0% coverageWriter's voice • 13 words • 0.0% coverage
Selected voice

Hakeem Jeffries

100%flagged-word coverage
64 attributed words25% of attributed speech73% writer coverage

No manipulation-pattern hits were found in this speaker's attributed words or the writer's voice.

Attribution is sentence-level. Pattern percentages are calculated only from words assigned to that voice.

Loading…
Loading…
Loading…

Analysis

Hover over highlighted words in the article to view the associated bias or fallacy analysis.