Topic summary
49% 1 analyzed article/video 653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These US Government Funding results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Appeal to Emotion , and False Dilemma , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.2% saturation with 180 hits . Analysis detected 1,338 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,959 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 64% (5,652 of 15,399 topics). This US Government Funding is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group. US Government Funding
Topic details
Total words: 1,959
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
63% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 63.3% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.2% 9.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 7.9% 7.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.1% 2.1% Quote-first Misdirection Sitewide 0.0% Topic 4.6% 4.6% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 5.5% 5.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 4.9% 4.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 5.1% 5.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0% False Dilemma: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 3.7% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.0% Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7% Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst