Keyword summary
51% 2 analyzed articles/videos 653 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Appropriations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 881 hits . Analysis detected 6,398 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,531 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (24,076 of 35,640 keywords). This Appropriations is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Appropriations
Keyword details
Total words: 7,531
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score2 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 9.9% 9.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 9.8% 9.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.5% 3.5% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 11.7% 11.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 11.7%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 1.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst