Publication summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Roll Call results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Framing Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 727 hits. Analysis detected 5,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This Roll Call is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Roll Call
Publication ranking list
PercentilePublicationBS Score
0%WSB-TV Channel 2 - Atlanta1%
1%Brookings1%
1%The Banner1%
1%FactCheck.org1%
1%@politifact1%
99%Utah Hockey Club13%
100%MS NOW Insights Community23%
100%MS NOW Live Events26%
100%www.globalsecurity.org30%
100%NBC 6 South Florida33%
0%Roll Call (selected)0%
Publication details
Total words: 5,572
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed publications

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

PublicationSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Publication 10.2%10.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Publication 10.5%10.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Publication 4.3%4.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Publication 2.8%2.8%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Publication 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Publication 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Publication 3.4%3.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Publication 1.1%1.1%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Publication 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Publication 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Publication 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 2.0%Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide ratePublication rate

Analyzed articles and videos