Publication summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Roll Call results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 13% saturation with 727 hits . Analysis detected 5,060 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,572 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 398 publications). This Roll Call is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Publication details
Total words: 5,572
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed publications
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Publication SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Publication 10.2% 10.2% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Publication 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Publication 4.3% 4.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Publication 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Publication 1.0% 1.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Publication 1.9% 1.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Publication 3.4% 3.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Publication 1.1% 1.1% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Publication 0.2% 0.2% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Publication 0.5% 0.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Publication 10.2%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Publication 10.5%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Publication 13.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Publication 4.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Publication 2.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Publication 6.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Publication 3.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Publication 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Publication 3.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Publication 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Publication 1.5%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Publication 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Publication 3.9%, sitewide 1.5% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Publication 3.8%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Publication 2.9%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Publication 0.5%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Publication 1.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Publication 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Ad Hominem: Publication 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Publication 0.3%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Publication 1.0%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Publication 1.7%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Publication rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst