Keyword summary
64%3 analyzed articles/videos999 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Reconciliation Package results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.3% saturation with 780 hits. Analysis detected 4,451 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,847 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of 38% (22,469 of 35,718 keywords). This Reconciliation Package is better (less manipulative) than 62.90% of the peer group.
Reconciliation Package
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
38%Reconciliation Package (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

37% percentile
025507510037.1% percentile
2.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles5.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.3%13.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.5%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate