Keyword summary
76% 22 analyzed articles/videos 14,427 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Defense Spending results contain 53 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 11% saturation with 9,704 hits . Analysis detected 87,969 faulty-reasoning hits from 88,498 analyzed words across 22 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 20% (27,363 of 34,040 keywords). This Defense Spending is better (less manipulative) than 80.40% of the peer group. Defense Spending
Keyword details
Total words: 88,498
Article count: 22
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
20% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 19.6% percentile 1.9% BS Score22 analyzed articles88.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.9% 4.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 11.0% 11.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.8% 3.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 8.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.3% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 1.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst