Author summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ro Khanna results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 16.4% saturation with 1,412 hits. Analysis detected 12,499 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,586 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 6,341 authors). This Ro Khanna is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ro Khanna
Author ranking list
PercentileAuthorBS Score
0%Vivek Chibber1%
0%Sneha Dey1%
0%Ideastream Public Media1%
0%Megan Fan Munce1%
1%Los Angeles Times staff1%
100%Greg Rosenstein38%
100%Siham Shamalakh43%
100%Greg Miller54%
100%Kevin Kniestedt60%
100%Bill Radke60%
0%Ro Khanna (selected)0%
Author details
Total words: 8,586
Article count: 1
Publications

Ranking context

Position among analyzed authors

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles8.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

AuthorSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Author 16.4%16.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Author 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Author 6.5%6.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Author 10.9%10.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Author 12.0%12.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Author 4.5%4.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Author 0.6%0.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Author 9.0%9.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Author 2.2%2.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Author 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Author 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Author 10.9%, sitewide 19.2%Indoctrination: Author 16.4%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Emotion: Author 6.5%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Author 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Author 4.5%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Author 9.2%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Author 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Author 9.0%, sitewide 3.3%Hasty Generalization: Author 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Author 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Author 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Author 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Author 5.3%, sitewide 2.7%Anecdotal: Author 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Author 3.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Author 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Author 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Pessimism Bias: Author 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Author 2.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Author 2.5%, sitewide 2.0%Loss Aversion: Author 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Author 2.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateAuthor rate

Analyzed articles and videos